Ed
Hooks' Monthly Newsletter
June
2003 |
Until
next month...Be Safe! |
ED
HOOKS URGES A "YES" VOTE ON SAG-AFTRA CONSOLIDATION
Ballots have been mailed, and union members will soon have the
opportunity to vote on this critically important issue. I favor
a yes vote. It is way past time that SAG and AFTRA become one.
It makes no sense for the unions to bicker over jurisdictional
matters or argue about the power of branches versus Hollywood
or the votes of broadcasters versus movie actors. The future
has arrived. Performances can be turned into zeros and ones.
All bets are off. In 1982, twenty-three companies controlled
95 percent of movie and TV production; in 2003, only six companies
control it all. We can continue to maintain the status quo on
our side, but that does not mean that change will not happen.
Producers are happily embracing a cyber future, and they are
laughing up their sleeves at the disarray of SAG and AFTRA.
Please, please, please -- vote "yes" on consolidation.
It is truly our best hope. IS
MTV SIGNALING THE WAVE OF THE FUTURE? IS THE
ACADEMY OF MOTION PICTURE ARTS AND SCIENCES LISTENING?
MTV created a new category for its awards show, Best Virtual
Performance. Gollum from "Lord of the Rings: Two Towers"
won. http://www.eonline.com/News/Items/0,1,11896,00.html?tnews
ED
HOOKS SAN FRANCISCO ACTING CLASSES JULY 18 - AUG. 5
(Note to CHICAGO students: Your regular Thursday night scene
study workshops will not be affected by this trip. I will
fly back from SF each week to be with you on Thursdays.)
I will teach 3-week intensive scene study workshops in both
Mountain View and San Francisco, mid-July to early August.
The tuition is $275, and classes at both locations will meet
two nights per week.. Mountain View classes will meet on Tuesday
night and Sunday night July 20, 22, 27, 29 and August 3, 5
at the Pear Avenue Theatre. San Francisco classes will meet
on Monday and Wednesday nights July 21, 23, 28, 30 and August
4, 6, but I don't have a firm location for them yet. If you
are interested in enrolling in one of these workshops, please
send me an e-mail at edhooks@edhooks.com, and I'll tell you
how to proceed.
I will
also be available for private coaching during my stay in the
Bay Area. I don't know where that might take place yet though.
If you are interested in private coaching ($75 per hour),
send me an e-mail so I can put your name on a list. That way,
as soon as I get the locations set, I can let you know.
HOOKS
STILL LOOKING FOR A SUITABLE HOME FOR THE SAN FRANCISCO TRIP
If you hear of something, let me know. I need a two-bedroom
place for the period July 16 - August 8. Either San Francisco
or the South Bay is the best for me. Sublet or a housesitting
situation is okay. I can water flowers and feed cats like
a pro. <g>
CHICAGO
CLASS SCHEDULE
SCENE STUDY -- On-going, Thursday nights, 7-10:30 at The Audition
Studio, 20 West Hubbard Street, #2W. Free audit, start any
time. $135 per month, sixteen week commitment. Here's a
Yahoo map to the The Audition Studio It is easy to reach
The Audition Studio on the CTA red line. Exit at Grand Street
and State. Walk two blocks south on State to Hubbard. The
#36 Broadway bus also stops very near the school.
A NEW FILM DEMO CLASS BEGINS NEXT TUESDAY JUNE 24TH
This 4-week workshop is limited to only four actors, and I
teach it in my own apartment in the Lakeview neighborhood
of Chicago. (Frankly, the final edited scenes have a higher
production value this way.) My apartment is located at 600
West Surf #3, at the corner of Broadway and Surf, a half block
south of the old Broadway acting studio. Here
is a map
REGARDING
CHICAGO COMMERCIALS WORKSHOPS
I'm still not sure what I'm going to do about commercials
workshops, and I apologize for it taking so long.. I'm in
discussions with executives at The Audition Studio. Stay tuned.
PRIVATE
COACHING
I'm always available for private coaching. My rate is $75
per hour. We can work on cold reading, career strategies or
whatever you want. Call 773-929-1667, or send an e-mail to
edhooks@edhooks.com.
HOOKS
ACTORS WORKING
JO MCKINLEY (F./TV''96) booked Boston Public, national commercials
for Ameriquest and Klondike, and an ongoing voiceover gig
for The Sims. AMY WATT (all classes '97), now in LA, appears
in "Playhouse Creatures" April DeAngelis, a comic
drama set in the 1660s in Restoration England. Details: Open
Fist Theatre Company, 1625 N. La Brea, Hollywood, CA 90028.
Call 323-882-6912 for info. and reservations. ERIC SWARTZ
(all classes '99) has been cast in a corporate film for Cisco
Systems. MEREDITH HAGEDORN (f/tv '00) and DIANE TASCA (s.stdy
- '96-'00) are featured in "Collected Stories" by
Donald Margulies at the Pear Avenue Theatre in Mountain View,
CA. Running Thursdays through Saturdays, August 1 - 17. For
info: www.dragonproductions.net or call 650-329-1656. SARA
BETTS (F/TV-'00) is featured as Hortense, the frisky French
maid, in "The Boyfriend" at the Dean Lescher Center
for the Performing Arts in Walnut Creek, June 5-28, 2003;
Thursday -Saturdays at 8:15pm; Sundays at 2;15pm. GENE GORE
(all classes '99-'00) has recently landed lead roles in three
independent films: "Doghouse" (a comedy) "The
Music Box" (a mystery) and, currently she is shooting
one entitled "Dumping Gretchen"
CRAFT
NOTES
MORAL OUTRAGE
There are many factors that share space in the definition
of an excellent actor. The obvious ones are an ability to
project your voice, to know what it means to play an action,
to stay in the moment theatrically and to play off the reality
of your scene partner. The not-so-obvious but perhaps most
important factor is that the actor have a sense of moral outrage.
First,
let me first tell you what I do not mean by this term "moral
outrage". I do not mean that you should be angry or that
you should be picking a fight when you act. Nor do I mean
that you must turn each of your roles into something political
or that you should look for elements of hostility in your
characters. A character can have a sense of moral outrage
and still be a pussycat.
The idea
of moral outrage goes back again to the shamanistic roots
of acting. Actors are like religious figures. Do you know
of a good priest or rabbi that does not care deeply about
his religion? How would you like it if you showed up at a
funeral for a good friend and the minister didn't seem to
have a position one way or the other about what makes a worthwhile
life?
Sometimes
you can be overt about it. Sometimes you have the good fortune
to be playing a character who is saying and doing things that
would take you personally to the barricades. More often than
not, though, that is not the case. Consider the play "Keely
and Du" by Jane Martin. The spine of the piece has to
do with a standoff between two women, one of whom is pro-choice
and one of whom is anti-choice. Suppose you are cast in the
role that is opposite of your personal real-life opinions?
Would you play that character with less gusto than the character
with whom you personally agree? If so, I can tell you right
now that you are a bad actor and should maybe consider pursuing
a different line of work. Both sides of that issue feel equally
as passionate. Both characters believe equally that she is
correct.
My point
is that having a sense of moral outrage does not mean you
have to agree with me philosophically or politically. As an
acting teacher, I only care that you care. Make your acting
personal. Stimulate yourself with it. What do you care about?
What trips your switch? What pushes you over the edge? Where
is your fire and passion? At what point do you stop turning
the other cheek and stand up for something? Contrary to what
David Mamet might believe, actors are not blank slates on
which playwrights write.
Recently
I was watching a couple of actors doing a scene from Edward
Albee's 1960's play "Zoo Story". The young man was
telling the older character about his comparatively less comfortable
lifestyle. He spoke of living in a small apartment with thin
walls and a "colored queen" next door. As I watched
the performance, I started wondering how, say, George Bush
or Donald Rumsfeld might respond to this story about the colored
queen. I started wondering how it would feel if one had an
opportunity to speak to one of these men in private and exclusively
about how life actually is experienced at the lower half of
the social spectrum. Had it been me playing the young man,
I would have made sure I rubbed the older guy's nose in the
reality of life real good. For me, it would not have been
a discussion, but a mission, an opportunity.
And then
I wondered (all of this while the scene was in progress, which
is fascinating on its own terms. I need to write some craft
notes one day about what goes through the audience's mind
during an actor's performance Š..) if maybe the actor
on stage who was playing the younger man was a Bushey, a Young
Republican. And if he was a Young Republican, what could he
do to show a sense of moral outrage about the inequity in
social status in America.
The answer
is that it doesn't matter what the personal position of the
actor on stage is. If he was a Young Republican, so what?
Doesn't matter! The important thing is that he care about
things and that he be willing to allow his character to care
about things. I remember once reading an interview with Peter
Brook in which he said that no matter how much you personally
love, your character loves more; no matter how much you hate,
your character hates more; no matter how much you care, your
character cares more. That is profoundly wise theatrical insight
in my opinion.
Return
to Top |