Ed
Hooks' Monthly Newsletter
March
2002 |
Until
next month...Be Safe!
|
ED'S
E-MAIL ADDRESS
If you have my e-mail address in an address book, please change
it as follows:
Old address: Ed Hooks@best.com
New address: edhooks@edhooks.com
"DIALECTS
ANYONE?...."
Here is a useful web site devoted to dialects. Thanks to Sara
Betts for passing it along to me. http://www.ukans.edu/~idea/index2.html
"LABAN
ANYONE?..."
Peggy Hackney's company, Integrated Movement Studies, is
beginning a graduate level training in Laban/Bartenieff Movement
Studies in Berkeley. Laban Movement Theory is very good stuff
for actors, dancers and animators. For info, contact Peggy
at 707-944-8473, or send her an e-mail at PJHackney@aol.com.
HOOKS
INTERVIEWED FOR WIRED MAGAZINE ARTICLE..
I was interviewed recently for an upcoming Wired Magazine
article on photo-real animation. In particular, the article
is about facial photo-real animation, which is the wave of
the future. My input has to do with acting issues, empathy,
expression of emotion and such. The writer is Lawrence Weschler,
and the piece will appear in the June issue.
NEW
ACTOR-DISCUSSION BOARD
Check out the following Internet discussion board, run by
the Showfax people. Showfax is owned by Breakdown Services
in LA. Good folks, well laid out discussion board:
http://www.2nd-tier.com/showfax_bbs/
HOOKS
ACTORS WORKING
JOSEPHINE DE JESUS (s.stdy -"01) portrayed Darrell in
Playback Media's "Customer Service Series". EYTAN
LASCA (s.stdy - current) has been cast in an indie film entitled
"Truth is Beauty". JEAN ROSE (commercials ' 01)
appeared in " I Hate Hamlet" at the Contra Costa
Civic Theatre in El Cerrito recently. ANNAN PATERSON (comml
-'97) will perform her solo show, "Deep Canyon",
at the U.C. Irvine Cancer Center in Anaheim, CA. On June 6th.
NATASHA BAKER (comml - '01) shot an industrial for Long's
Drug Stores and a PSA for the Oakland School District. STEFANI
BISHOP (s.stdy - current) is appearing in Barefoot in the
Park, through March 2nd, at Palos South (Illinois) Middle
School. For ticket info, call 708-403-4421. KELLY BANKS (f/tv
- 02) landed an industrial for MacDonald's.
AUDITION
IN HOOKS' CHICAGO STUDIO...
Sketchie.com Productions will be hosting auditions for The
Pickpocket Union, an experimental comedy group dedicated to
21st Century projects. The PPU will work on character and
scene work to create short DV films with a strong satirical
perspective. Pickpocket will also develop into a professional
sketch group. This is an opportunity for dedicated artist
to hone their craft, and generate global visibility via the
web. Opportunities for cast members to build a reel will also
emerge making a move to NY or LA less painful.
Auditions
will be held on March 19 and March 21 at 7:00 - 9:00 pm at:
Ed Hooks Studio @ 2908 N
Broadway in Lakeview in Chicago.
HOOKS
CHICAGO CLASS SCHEDULE
SCENE STUDY -- Monday or Wednesday, 7-10:30, on-going. Free
audit, start any time.
COMMERCIALS WORKSHOP -- March 16-17. 9-4 Saturday and 10-5
Sunday.
FILM DEMO WORKSHOP -- Develop your own demo reel while working
the differences between acting on stage and acting in movies.
Next start date: Tuesday, April 2nd. Nine-week class.
PRIVATE COACHING -- Any time. $75 per hour. Work on monologues,
career strategies, whatever.
CRAFT
NOTES
"Casting Director Showcases"
The California
State Labor Commission is coming down hard on casting director
showcases, and it will behoove actors everywhere to keep an
eye on the proceedings. If the events are banned or regulated
in California, there is every likelihood that they will in
turn be banned or regulated by other states.
Casting
director showcases are events in which actors get the opportunity
to pay to audition for a casting director. It usually is a
cold reading from "sides", pages out of a movie
or TV script, and the typical charge in Hollywood is $25 -
$40 per class.
The problem
is that this kind of thing sounds a lot like a paid audition,
and paid auditions are a big no-no in our industry. Screen
Actors Guild has a flat out rule that prohibits its members
for paying for auditions. Talent agents are prohibited by
California state law and performing union regulations from
conducting workshops because of the inherent conflict of interest.
Screen Actors Guild also has contracts in place with movie
and television producers that specify there will be no paid-auditions
when actors are being considered for roles.
Let me
say right away that I am personally opposed to casting director
showcases and have been since they first surfaced back in
the mid 1980's. I favor either an outright ban on the events
or, at minimum, the kind of regulation that is currently applied
to talent agents. Let me explain where I am coming from on
this, please.
First,
let's define the players in this game:
CASTING
DIRECTORS work for producers. They are paid a fee for going
out into the world to find actors for whatever project is
being cast.
TALENT
AGENTS work for actors. Agents make their money from commissions
on the work that the actors book.
ACTORS
are in search of paying acting work, and there is no other
way to access that work other than via talent agents and casting
directors.
In an
efficient marketplace, casting directors would earn 100 percent
of their income from the producers, and talent agents would
earn 100 percent of their income from commissions. The problem
with the casting director showcases is that, in the guise
of "education", the casting directors are charging
the actors to meet people they might not otherwise be able
to meet.
The entrepreneurs
that promote the showcases basically function like pimps.
They bring in the best-connected casting directors and then
advertise their presence to the acting community, usually
in trade press like Backstage-DramaLogue, Callboard Magazine
in San Francisco and so on. The actor writes the checks, and
the entrepreneur/promoter and the casting director split up
the dollars. It's a nice racket, like taking candy from babies.
Because
they know there is the appearance of a conflict of interest,
the casting directors at the showcases make a big deal of
their objectivity. They make announcements to the effect that
"the presence of a casting director is not a guarantee
or promise of employment." But that doesn't change anything.
They can make announcements all day long, and you still have
actors paying to meet casting directors. In my book, and now
in the book of the California State Labor Commission, that
amounts to a paid audition.
I have
had many conversations with actors that regularly pay to participate
in these showcases. Their justifications usually boil down
to the following:
(1) "I
can't get an agent to represent me, and I've been trying for
a long time. At least at the showcases, I can audition for
the casting directors. I feel like I'm doing SOMETHING for
my career!"
(2) "I can afford it. It's only $30."
(3) "Who better to learn from than a casting director,
a person that is actually working in the industry?"
(4) "I've known people to land good jobs after going
to the showcases."
When you
scratch the surface of these arguments, however, the showcases
quickly lose their luster. Here are my primary objections:
1) The
casting director showcases imply that casting directors are
looking for fresh talent at the showcases. Usually, this is
not the case at all. When paying acting work is being cast,
the casting directors will always call talent agents. That
is because the talent agents have a financial incentive (commissions)
to represent the actors most likely to book the jobs - i.e.
the best actors in the marketplace. When paying work is being
cast, the very last thing a casting director will do is start
checking the enrollment lists for the showcases.
2) The showcases can actually be COUNTER-PRODUCTIVE for an
actor's career because so many loser-actors participate in
them. A great many of the participants are actors that, for
one reason or another, cannot get agents to represent them.
If the actor were any good, goes the logic, he would have
an agent. Therefore, an actor who shows up at showcases runs
the risk that the casting director will actually respect him
less, not more.
3) Casting directors that do the showcase circuit claim to
be motivated by a love of actors. "I just want to help
the actors", is the line I have heard more than any other.
Well, given that the casting directors work for producers,
why don't they go help THEM? I am immediately suspicious of
casting directors that express their affection for actors.
It seems to me that, if the casting directors really want
to help actors, they would offer the showcases for free. Let
the producers pay for them.
The casting director showcase people are not taking this lying
down of course. One does not take a dog's dish away while
he is eating, if you get my drift. The promoters have banded
together and hired a big anti-labor law firm in Hollywood.
There is going to be a battle royal in the California legislature
over this, with plenty of big time faces testifying. Don't
be surprised if you start seeing stories about it in the general
press and on CNN.
Thomas
Kerrigan is an attorney for the California Division of Labor
Standards Enforcement, and he is the one carrying the water
on this deal. If you want to let him know you support what
he is doing, drop me a line and I'll tell you how to contact
him.
If you're
interested in following the industry debates on this subject,
I recommend several avenues. The first is a web site run by
Hollywood casting director Billy DaMota. The address is http://www.DoNotPay.org.
The second is alt.acting, an un-monitored Internet user-group.
I post there from time to time. The third is a List-Serve
on which you will find many acting professionals, so the level
of dialogue is higher. It is called ACT-PRO. To subscribe
to ACT-PRO, send email to listserv@HOME.EASE.LSOFT.COM
and in the body of the message, put SUBSCRIBE ACTING-PRO.
Return
to Top
|