Ed
Hooks' Monthly Newsletter
Mid-May
2002 |
Until
next month...Be Safe!
|
HOOKS
IN GERMANY
I'll be in Germany May 20-26, teaching acting to animation students
at Filmakademie Baden-Wortemborg in Ludwigsburg and giving a
speech on "The Thinking Character" at FMX '02 in Stuttgart.
There will not be scene study classes on Monday May 20th or
Wednesday May 22nd. Classes resume on Monday May 27th.
COMMERCIALS
WORKSHOP MOVED TO JUNE 1-2
The commercials workshop scheduled for this coming weekend
May 18-19 has been moved two weeks later, to June 1-2 because
of the conflict with my Germany trip.
FILM
DEMO CLASS BEGINS TUESDAY JUNE 18TH. Nine-week
workshop, shoot and edit two demo scenes. Learn differences
between acting on film and acting on stage. Also work on audition
technique/cold reading for movies and TV.
SCENE
STUDY ON-GOING
Monday and Wednesday night classes, both open. 7-10:30. Free
audit, start any time. Sixteen-week commitment.
STAGE
DIRECT.COM --EXCELLENT NEW SITE!
Check out this web site: http://www.stagedirect.com. Some
very enterprising theatre people in Portland started this
site where you can preview and purchase videos of fringe plays
shot on digital video. It's a great idea, and the site is
well designed. Gary Cole is the CEO of StageDirect, and he
had this to say in response to my interest in the site: "What
we feel that many people overlook is that it is possible to
be smart, challenging, provocative AND entertaining at the
same time. There tends to be an assumption that if a play
is being staged by no-name actors in a small theater it must
be esoteric and inaccessible. We're out to prove that wrong...."
I applaud this sentiment. With gusto!
NEW
BABY FOR THE LASIT FAMILY
Congrats to Mel and Kevin Lasit (f/tv -'91) and their new
daughter McKenna, born May 8th at 8:09pm after a lo-o-o-n-g
labor. Mom and baby are healthy and thriving.<g>
HOOKS
ACTORS WORKING
ROBERT GEROVSKI, CINDY LORUSSO, MARY CAMPBELL and DAN ROCHA
(all current in Chicago scene study) have been cast in "The
Layman's Guide to Safe Sex", playing for one night only
at the Bailiwick, June 19th. PAUL McKINNEY (s.stdy & f/tv
- '96-'99), living and working in La-La Land now, booked a
national spot for Budweiser. Paul is also getting married
in August! Congrats, Big Guy.<g> LARRY LAVERTY shot
an episode of "The Practice". JAXY BOYD (s.stdy
& f/tv '-94-'95) shot an industrial for Kaiser/Bayer Aspirin.
Jaxy is also the interim president of the San Francisco local
of Screen Actors Guild. Thanks for the hard work, Jaxy! LE
ANNE RUMBEL (s.stdy & f/tv '-01) has been cast as Ursula
in "Much Ado About Nothing" at the Marin Shakespeare
Festival. KEIR BEADLING shot an indie short entitled "Man
in a White Linen Suit. He also shot a Docudrama for the Discovery
Channel entitled "Trailside Killer" and an industrial
for Dey Labs Pharmaceuticals. Congrats on all the activity,
Keir! PAT TYLER (s.stdy - '01) has been cast as the Nurse
in "Scapino!" for Palo Alto Players. It will run
at the Lucie Stern Theatre in Palo Alto June 15-30. LISA WISEMAN
(s.stdy - '94) appears in "The Diary of Ann Frank"
at the Western Stage in Salinas, California through the end
of June. SONJA SORIANO (s.stdy -'01) booked a lead role in
a promo spot for "Animal Planet", to run on their
Internet site within the next few weeks. WALTER BARRY (s.stdy
- '99) shot a commercial for The State Bank of Nevada. LEN
SCHAFFER (s.stdy '93) joins the cast of "Are We Almost
There?" on Friday, 5/24. It's playing at the Jean Shelton
Theatre in SF. Call 415-345-7575.
CRAFT
NOTES
ACTING INSANE
I recently
saw a production of "Death and the Maiden" by Ariel
Dorfman at Chicago's TimeLine Theatre, and it set me to thinking
about insanity and obsession. The lead and meaty role of Paulina
Salas contains a substantial trap for actresses that would
portray her, and I think the talented actress Mary O'Dowd
got at least partially ensnared by it.
The set
up is this: Paulina Salas and her diplomat husband, Gerardo,
are living in a post-junta Chile. It is established in the
opening moments of the play that Paulina is not a happy woman,
but we don't initially know why. She appears tense, withdrawn,
wary, quiet. Enter her husband who handles her with kid gloves
and sensitivity. Clearly she has been in this mental state
for a while, and he has had to deal with it. After some give
and take between them, a third character enters, Roberto Miranda,
who had met up with Gerado while on the road fixing a flat
tire. Sounds innocent enough, right? Well, Paulina goes directly
off the deep end with the man. She finds a pistol, takes him
captive, ties him to a chair, gags him and proceeds to torment
him. The reason is that she believes he is one that tortured
and repeatedly raped her some years earlier during Pinochet's
junta. During that ordeal she had been blindfolded, so she
cannot be absolutely certain of the man's identity, but she
has circumstantial evidence. She recognizes his smell and
the sound of his voice and is struck by his preference for
Shubert's haunting "Death and the Maiden", which
she recalls was always playing in the background whenever
she was raped.
The primary
action of the play involves Paulina's attempts to get a confession
from Roberto. How certain can she be that this is the man?
What will she do if he confesses? Can his confession be believed
if it is made under threat of violence? I'll let you see the
play to learn how all of this evolves and, yes, I do recommend
the production. Go to http://www.TimeLineTheatre.com
for info about tickets and dates.
But here's
the acting issue: How does the actor justify all of this violence
against a total stranger that enters her house if she cannot
be absolutely certain that he is who she thinks he is? Mary
O'Dowd chose to position her Paulina on the edge of insanity.
In my opinion, she went just a bit too far over the edge.
It is totally understandable and even justifiable that she
would position the character where she did but, in doing so,
she robbed the audience of the opportunity to empathize. What
we feel for Paulina is sympathy, not empathy. Ms. O'Dowd plays
the character as a victim rather than as a survivor that has
been victimized. And the error is clear in the opening moments
of the play, when we see Paulina crouching and peering around
in the shadows of her own home, alone and afraid.
Of course
any person that had been tortured as much as Paulina was would
be forever scarred by the experience. Her agony was not unlike
that of many Nazi concentration camp survivors in fact. But
here is the acting challenge: What we in the audience want
to see is the survival mechanism in the character. We don't
need to be told that rape and torture was bad. By tilting
her character into a state of agitation and obsession over
unresolved pain, Mary O'Dowd elicits from us a nod of sad
acknowledgement and nothing more.
Actors
are shamans. We talk to the tribe about how to get through
life successfully. What are we to make of Paulina Salas and
her entrapment of Roberto Miranda? We feel awful for the woman,
and we are relieved that we have not ourselves had to endure
such horrors. But at the end of this production, we are left
with the suggestion that the events of the play will not lead
to any particular satisfactory resolution for Paulina. She
was tormented, disturbed and afraid at the beginning when
we first met her, and she seems to be headed for more of the
same after we leave the theatre. We have spent an hour and
a half with a disturbed person in the midst of extraordinary
behavior, examined her situation, shook our respective heads
in pity and walked back out into the sunshine.
ACTING
NOTE
When you
must justify extreme behavior for a character, think twice
before you use the insanity defense. We want to know that
a character is choosing her actions and is responsible for
them. If she is merely mentally ill, we can only feel pity.
If you
absolutely must use insanity as a justification, then keep
at least a small window of sanity open. Anthony Hopkins in
"Silence of the Lambs" shows the way with his Hannibal
Lector. Here was a serial killer that literally ate his victims,
and yet we felt empathy for him instead of sympathy. We actually
rooted for him to survive. If he had played that role as obsessive
and wild-eyed, he would have lost us. Yes, he was crazy, but
he was still human enough to feel empathy for the detective
Starling, played by Jodie Foster, and so we in the audience
could empathize with him. We in the audience were able to
keep Lector within the family of man because he was trying
to survive and was in control of his actions. And therein
we could find a lesson in life, making for a satisfactory
theatrical experience.
One other
good example: "Nuts" by Tom Topor. The female lead
in that play has killed a man that abused her. The action
takes place during her subsequent sanity hearing. The play
works because she insists she was sane when she did what she
did. If she had claimed insanity, we would have had no play
at all!
I applaud
Mary O'Dowd for her work in this production of "Death
and the Maiden". I think she made an intelligent and
powerful attempt to unravel a difficult and trap-filled character.
She came very close to getting it right, and I appreciate
the opportunity to examine the acting issues involved.
Return
to Top
|